Armco Steel Corp. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The petitioner, Armco Steel Corporation, appeals the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which granted benefits to the claimant, Joseph Kolar, for total disability resulting from an occupational disease under Section 108 (n) of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.1
The claimant was employed by the petitioner from April of 1934 until February 8, 1976, in a hot mill, which produced seamless steel pipe and where, as the referee found, he was exposed to the hazards of dusts from coal, graphite, chrome, manganese and mckel used in the production…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Robachinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kistler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Patel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Andersen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Miller v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.