Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 11, 1980No. Appeal, No. 554 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
The only issue raised on this appeal by Petitioner United States Steel Corporation (Employer) is whether the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) erred in affirming a referee’s grant of workmen’s compensation benefits to Charles G-ouker (Claimant) pursuant to Section 306(c) (22) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §513(22). It is undisputed that Claimant suffered a “serious and permanent disfigurement ... of such a character as to produce an unsightly appearance, and such as is not usually…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- McGartland v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Yaklich v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. PizzoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jonathan Sheppard Stables v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Hastings Industries v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- American Chain & Cable Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Purex Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Hemer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.