Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1997No. 64212-5PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

939 P.2d 1223 (1997)

132 Wash.2d 498

The STATE of Washington, Petitioner,

v.

Earl S. LEE, Respondent.

No. 64212-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 17, 1997.

Jeffrey Sullivan, Yakima County Prosecutor, Michael G. McCarthy, and Bruce Hanify, Deputy County Prosecutors, Yakima, for petitioner.

Hugh Spall, Jr., Ellensburg, for respondent.

MADSEN, Justice.

The trial court held that offenses which are part of a common plan are subject to the mandatory joinder rule of former CrR 4.3(c) and dismissed the charges in this case because they were not joined with those prosecuted in State v. Lee, 128…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of BreedloveWashington Supreme Court · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API