Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 2, 1958No. 50406PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a claim for unemployment compensation taxes paid to the State of North Carolina as a contract cost in the performance of a cost-plus-fixed-fee Government contract. Plaintiff further seeks a declaratory judgment as to other excess taxes not yet accrued.

The Commissioner was directed to make findings of fact and to recommend legal conclusions in the light of the findings of fact under the Rules of this court.

Pursuant to such reference, the Commissioner has submitted his findings of fact and conclusion of law.

The court, after having considered the evidence, the briefs and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  2. Twin Cities Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  3. Federal Cartridge Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API