Legal Opinion

Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 8, 1957No. 155-53PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

This is a suit to recover $420,212.46 claimed to have been expended by plaintiff on account of its contract No. W-7405-eng-149 (hereinafter referred to as contract 149) with the Manhattan District of the War Department.

The claim is based upon excess unemployment compensation taxes which plaintiff was required during the years 1947 through 1950 to pay to the State of Illinois by reason of its operation under the contract of a Government-owned plant at Decatur, Illinois, on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis. The plaintiff would not have been required to pay *300these excess taxes were it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pneumatic Gun-Carriage & Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
  2. Federal Cartridge Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  3. L. B. Smith, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. General Bronze Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. United States Rubber Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API