Legal Opinion

(PC) Ngo v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 25, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01423Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MY NGO, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01423-KES-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND 13 v. TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 14 TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON 15 Defendants. WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED 16 Docs. 18, 19 17 18 Plaintiff My Ngo is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API