Studdard v. Wells
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Platte Circuit Court.-Hon. J. M. Sandusky, Judge. (1) The deed read in evidence, from Charles E. Studdard and Matilda Studdard to Theodore Studdard, is upon conditions. Lindsey v. Lindsey, 45 Ind. 553; Blum v. Bush, 49 N. W. Rep. 142; Nolan v. Nolan, 78 Mich.'24'; Bichterv. Bichter, 12 N. E. Rep.; Stilwell v. Knapper, 69 Ind. 558; Leach v. Leach, 4 Ind. 628; Wilson v. Wilson, 86 Ind: 474; Jenlcinsv.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Platte Circuit Court.-Hon. J. M. Sandusky, Judge. (1) The deed read in evidence, from Charles E. Studdard and Matilda Studdard to Theodore Studdard, is upon conditions. Lindsey v. Lindsey, 45 Ind. 553; Blum v. Bush, 49 N. W. Rep. 142; Nolan v. Nolan, 78 Mich.'24'; Bichterv. Bichter, 12 N. E. Rep.; Stilwell v. Knapper, 69 Ind. 558; Leach v. Leach, 4 Ind. 628; Wilson v. Wilson, 86 Ind: 474; Jenlcinsv. Jenlcins, 3 Monroe, 327; Scott’s'heirs v. Scott, 3 B. Monroe, 2; Cross v. Carson, 8 Blackford, 138; Messersmith v. ■Mess&rsmith, 22 Mo. 369; Mo ore v. Wingate, 53 Mo. 398. (2) The word…
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P. J.
The plaintiffs, who are the widow and three minor children of Theodore Studdard, brought this action of ejectment against the executor of the last will of Charles F. Studdard and against the tenant of said executor, to recover the possession of eighty acres of land in Platte county. The judgment being for the plaintiffs, the defendants sued out this appeal.
On the tenth of February, 1873, Charles F. Studdard and his wife, Matilda, by their deed of that date,’ conveyed the land in question to their son Theodore. The deed uses the words, “grant, bargain and sell,” recites a consideration of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. WingateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Morrill v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- Ellis v. KygerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Clarke v. Inhabitants of the Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Anderson v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Haydon v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Catron v. Scarritt Collegiate InstituteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Helms v. Helms.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.