Legal Opinion
Wichita Falls & Southern Railroad v. Durham
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1938No. 7100PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Martin
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.
A full statement of the factual background of the present controversy appears in the opinion of the Court of Civil Ap peals. Durham v. Wichita Falls & S. R. R. Co., 92 S. W. (2d) 282. We will here epitomize the case, giving only such facts as we regard as controlling. ‘ Durham was employed as a fireman by plaintiff in error and received injuries which he alleges permanently disable him, as fully set out in the above opinion. The case is ruled by the terms of the Federal Employers Liability Act. Among these is the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Storaasli v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Taylor v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Desmarais v. People's Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Mitzel v. SchatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- DiGrazia v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- Dobbs v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.