Legal Opinion

Dobbs v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1961No. 16224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Appellees, E. M. Russell et al., sued Alma Dobbs as Administratrix of the Estate of J. A. Dobbs, deceased, to establish a debt due them by the Estate. Said deceased died intestate. Judgment was entered in the trial court upon jury findings to the effect that the attorney for the appellant Ad-ministratrix, by his acts, representations and conduct, led appellees to believe that the Administratrix would approve and pay the claim against the estate filed by them; that such acts, representations and conduct of said attorney were such as would lead a reasonably prudent person…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ditto v. Ditto Investment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crosby v. McWillieTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Rauch v. HearneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. First Nat. Bank of Alvarado v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. DobbsTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. v. CITY OF MONT BELVIEU, TEX.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Pearson v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. STATE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Charro Boring, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API