Legal Opinion
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1987No. 87 Civ. 2685 (RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In this action for fraud and negligent misrepresentation, defendants Sullivan & Cromwell and Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. have moved for an order pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is denied.
Prior Proceedings
In March 1983, a group of plaintiffs, represented by Edward J. Swan, Esq., commenced in this court an action entitled Cresswell, et. al. v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc., 83 Civ.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Francisco Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. GroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Yeadon v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Dowlin v. DowlinWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Roth v. La Societe Anonyme Turbomeca FranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Turkish v. KasenetzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.