Mitchell v. Stinson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Fulton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
— This action is upon a negotiable promissory note executed by the appellee to one A. G. Burros, and by him endorsed to the appellant.
The questions which first require consideration are those *325presented by the ruling on the demurrer to the answer. Appellee contends that the demurrer is addressed to the entire answer and not to the paragraphs distributively, and that, as there are certainly some good paragraphs, there was no error in overruling the demurrer. It is undoubtedly the law that a demurrer addressed to an entire pleading, composed of several paragraphs, must be overruled if there be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Silvers v. Junction RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Rennick v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Copeland v. State ex rel. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Independent Harvester Co. v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.