Legal Opinion

Rennick v. Chandler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— This was a proceeding by Samuel S. Chandler, Eliza J. Chandler, Josephus Chandler and Alice M. Chandler, against Lydia E. Rennick and Thomas Rennick, her husband, Jacob G. Wolf, Jesse Wolf and John W. Wolf, to have partition of certain real estate, and to enforce a lien on a portion of said real estate, in favor of the said Samuel S. Chandler, for erecting a dwelling-house, and making other improvements thereon, in pursuance of a contract entered into between him and one Charity Chandler, who was then his wife, and afterward the mother of the said Eliza J., Josephus and Alice M. Chandler,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BohlfingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Fankboner v. FankbonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Silvers v. Junction RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Landringham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Paris v. StrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Camp Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  4. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Pfeiffer v. CraneIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API