Legal Opinion

Matthew v. Fläkt Woods Group SA

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 20, 2012No. 150, 2012PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

This is an appeal from a decision dismissing a complaint against a foreign business entity for lack of personal jurisdiction. The foreign company allegedly conspired with other defendants to divest appellant of his interest in a lucrative joint venture. That plan was accomplished, in part, by causing the dissolution of a Delaware limited liability company co-founded by appellant. Under the “conspiracy theory” of personal jurisdiction, a plaintiff must allege facts from which one can infer that a foreign defendant knew or should have known that the conspiracy would have a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Sample v. MorganCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Newsome v. GallacherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  3. Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  4. 300 W 22 Realty, LLC v. Strathmore Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  5. ATM Shafiqul Khalid v. Elon R. MuskCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API