Legal Opinion

Bernsden v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1953No. 38,789PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This is an appeal from an order entered by the court below sustaining appellee’s motion for a new trial setting aside the verdict of the jury and granting a new trial on the ground that the expert testimony introduced in the case was was not sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

Appellant Louise Bernsden will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, and appellee Dr. C. N. Johnson, as defendant.

The action was one for malpractice alleging that defendant was negligent in allowing a breathing tube to become lodged in the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Sly v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Yard v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Webb v. LungstrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Collins v. MeekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Goheen v. GraberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Rule v. CheesemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Hare v. WendlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API