Legal Opinion

Hare v. Wendler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1997No. 77,959PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J:

This is a summary judgment medical malpractice personal injuiy case. The primary focus is on the absence of expert testimony on causation and damages and the application of the common knowledge exception to the expert testimony requirement. Gerald W. Hare appeals from judgments granted to defendants Kristopher K. Wendler, M.D. and The Kansas Psychiatric Institutes, Inc., d/b/a “The Kansas Institute” (TKI). Hare’s petition alleged that Wendler, a psychiatrist, had engaged in sexual relations with Hare, his patient at TKI, a psychiatric hospital.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Webb v. LungstrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Collins v. MeekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Kastner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Perkins v. Susan B. Allen Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  4. Venters v. SellersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. Banfi v. American Hospital for RehabilitationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API