Legal Opinion

Parkmed Co. v. Pro-Life Counselling, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard Lee Price, J.

Motion Nos. 61 and 62 of July 7, 1981 are consolidated for disposition. Plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction pursuant to CPLR 6301 enjoining defendants from demonstrating, picketing, or in any way interfering with the normal operation of plaintiff’s clinic and precluding defendants from engaging in such activities on the plaza and sidewalk in front of 475 Park Avenue South, New York City. Defendants cross-move pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], pars 3, 7) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff lacks capacity to assert the legal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Galella v. OnassisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project JerichoOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Parkmed Co. v. Pro-Life Counselling, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API