Legal Opinion
At & T CORP. v. Lucas County
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 15, 2005No. 3:02 CV 7516PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This case involves the forced relocation of a telecommunication cable so that the City of Toledo could build a baseball stadium over a portion of Superior Street. Plaintiff AT & T Corp. brings claims for breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and uncompensated takings-brought directly and via 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending are cross-motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 44 and 45 respectively). Defendant has filed a Response (Doc. No. 49) and a Reply (Doc. No. 53), and Plaintiff has filed a combined Response and Reply (Doc. No. 52).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mentor v. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024