Legal Opinion
Disch v. Helary, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1986No. C1-85-1404PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
Early in the morning of March 20, 1983, appellant was injured when the car in which she was a passenger drove off the road. She brought suit against the driver and respondent Helary, Inc., alleging dram shop liability. Respondent denied serving the driver, and the jury found for respondent. After trial, a person who did not testify filed an affidavit stating that the respondent’s case was based on a conspiracy to lie.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Minder v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Regents of University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Dostal v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Peller v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Dostal v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.