Legal Opinion

International Components Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 25, 1987No. Court No. 79-12-01796Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

*618(Decided August 25, 1987) Mandel & Grunfeld (Steven P. Florsheim), for plaintiff. Richard K. Willard, Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch (Paula N. Rubin), for defendant. Re, Chief Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Japan, and described on the customs invoices as "fractional horsepower direct current permanent magnet motors.”

The merchandise was classified by the Customs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. NEC America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API