Kartman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
TIM A. BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction.
Prior to filing this lawsuit, Plaintiffs’ counsel undertook a comprehensive factual investigation relevant to the claims being asserted. Plaintiffs’ investigation garnered numerous documents from publicly available sources, including from Defendant State Farm’s own web sites. After Plaintiffs filed suit, State Farm served interrogatories on Plaintiffs requesting the documents obtained by Plaintiffs’ counsel’s investigation. Although Plaintiffs plan to use these documents “for the purpose of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Leo Logan v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Caremark, Inc. v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Averyt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- ESTATE OF PAUL DANIELS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLISDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
- Livingston et.al. v. VIWAPADistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022