Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 2018No. CR–79–199PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn Dan Kemp, Chief Justice

Pending before this court is petitioner Lewis C. Wallace's pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis and a pro se motion to reply to the State's response to his coram nobis petition. Wallace's claim for coram nobis relief is based on an allegation that the prosecutor withheld material evidence and knowingly used perjured testimony in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). We find from a review of the allegations contained in Wallace's petition and its attached exhibits that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Penn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Westerman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Osburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Makkali v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Shequita L. Joiner v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API