Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Lichty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1891No. 298PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Yakima County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The demurrer of the defendant Lichty to the amended complaint, for want of sufficient facts, having *215been overruled, and he declining to plead further, a decree was entered for the plaintiff. The other defendants seem to have appeared by demurrer to the original complaint, but the record shows no plea by them to the amended complaint; and we can only presume, therefore, that they did so plead, as the decree includes all the defendants, and all appeal therefrom.

The complaint shows the following facts: Before his death, August 7, 1874, Walter P.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. May v. Le ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Deford v. MercerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Davidson v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Penn v. HeiseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Pursley v. HaysSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Lichty v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
  3. Lichty v. LewisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1894
  4. Rohne v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re Cooper's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API