Legal Opinion
Rohne v. Horton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1935No. 25174. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This is the third chapter before this court over the estate of Dexter Horton, deceased. See Trethewey v. Horton, 71 Wash. 402, 128 Pac. 632, and In re Rohne, 157 Wash. 62, 288 Pac. 269.
A noticed motion to strike the statement of facts and dismiss the appeal was passed to the merits for disposition.
The record shows: Appellant prepared a proposed statement of facts and filed it in the office of the King county clerk of the superior court on April 11, 1934, or within the time required by the then rule for filing proposed statements. On the same day, she made due service thereof by delivering a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDowell v. BeckhamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. McCullochWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Krutz v. IsaacsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Lewis v. LichtyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Rohne v. TretheweyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Townsend v. RosenbaumWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Hillyard v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- duPont v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1973