Legal Opinion
United States v. Ira Nathan Heaps
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1994No. 93-5923PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed in part and affirmed in part by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge K.K. HALL joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
I
The defendant, Ira Nathan Heaps, has appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia finding him guilty of all counts of an eight-count indictment. Count 1 charged the defendant with conspiracy to possess and distribute methylendioxyamphetamine (MDA), commonly known as “ecstasy,” in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Stephen Martin BeddowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alberto ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Joseph Jesse EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. CabralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Ricardo U. Alerre, United States of America v. Deborah Bordeaux, United States of America v. Michael D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. TrejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Raymond Torres, Joseph S. Aflleje, and Barbara Aflleje-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.