Legal Opinion
United States v. Ricardo U. Alerre, United States of America v. Deborah Bordeaux, United States of America v. Michael D. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 1, 2005No. 03-4207, 03-4212, 04-4161PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge MOTZ joined.
KING, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Ricardo U. Alerre, Deborah S. Bordeaux, and Michael D. Jackson (the “defendants”) challenge the various convictions and sentences imposed on them in the District of South Carolina. The defendants — medical doctors — seek a new trial on drug distribution, drug conspiracy, and money-laundering conspiracy charges lev ied against them by the grand jury. The multiple charges in their indictment arise from an alleged…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MoussaouiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Ronald A. McIver and All Out Bail Bonding Giggies Bonding Company, Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Michael Robert PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.