Drafts v. Celebrezze
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Action by plaintiff to set aside a final decision by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare that he was not “disabled” within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Judicial review is limited to a determination of whether or not the Secretary’s decision is supported by “substantial evidence.” If it is so supported, it must be affirmed; however, if undue reliance has been placed upon one portion of the record to the disregard of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, then the Secretary’s decision must be reversed. Thomas v. Celebrezze, 331 F.2d 541 (4th Cir.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- William E. Hanes v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Bagwell v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1964
- Hill v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
- Miles v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- William T. Miracle v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Vera Sayers v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Seldon Davidson v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- George E. Polly v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Haskins v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.