Legal Opinion

Kingery v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided May 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-01353PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge.

Pending before the court is the plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification [Docket 220]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion [Docket 220] is GRANTED.

I. Background

This case arises out of Quicken Loans, Inc.’s (“Quicken”) alleged failure to provide credit score disclosures “as soon as reasonably practicable,” in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681g(g). Section 1681g(g), provides as follows:

Any person who makes or arranges loans and who uses a consumer credit score, as defined in subsection (f)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

GAREY v. JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020
HATCH v. DEMAYODistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020