Legal Opinion

Crary v. Goldsmith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1948No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 44,103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

On October 16, 1944, DeLand Crary, as guardian of the person and estate of Neal K. Potter, filed the instant bill of complaint in chancery asking that the defendant Goldsmith be enjoined from proceeding with an action at law against the defendant corporation, that said corporation be restrained from honoring a purported assignment or paying the defendant Goldsmith any funds of the plaintiff Neal K. Potter, that said assignment be declared to be void, that the amount of attorney fees to which the defendant Goldsmith was entitled for representing Neal K. Potter be determined by the court under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lyon v. MinorMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wylie v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In Re PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. School Dist. Bd. of Ed.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rex v. RexMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re Eddy EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Begovich v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. MuzeckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API