Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1922No. 6 Div. 241PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal is from a decree confirming the report of the special master on a bill and cross-bill praying an accounting. Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson, 205 Ala. 347, 87 South. 186; Hamilton v. Terry Co., 206 Ala. 622, 91 South. 489.

There may be liability and accounting in a joint adventure that does not contravene public policy and is in conformity_ with law. Christie v. Durden, 205 Ala. 571, 88 South. 667; Saunders v. McDonough, 191 Ala. 119, 67 South. 591; s. c. 201 Ala. 321, .78 South. 160; James v. Hendree’s Adm’r, 34 Ala. 488. The joint adventure for consideration in this ease came about…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Doe ex dem Duval's heirs v. McLoskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  3. Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Christie v. DurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Hunt v. AcreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Bay Minette Land Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Elledge v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API