Lunsford v. Shannon
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal is from a decree confirming the report of the special master on a bill and cross-bill praying an accounting. Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson, 205 Ala. 347, 87 South. 186; Hamilton v. Terry Co., 206 Ala. 622, 91 South. 489.
There may be liability and accounting in a joint adventure that does not contravene public policy and is in conformity_ with law. Christie v. Durden, 205 Ala. 571, 88 South. 667; Saunders v. McDonough, 191 Ala. 119, 67 South. 591; s. c. 201 Ala. 321, .78 South. 160; James v. Hendree’s Adm’r, 34 Ala. 488. The joint adventure for consideration in this ease came about…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Doe ex dem Duval's heirs v. McLoskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
- Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Christie v. DurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Hunt v. AcreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Bay Minette Land Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Elledge v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.