Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1924No. 6 Div. 123PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Ernest Hauls sued the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a corporation, to recover possession of lots 1, 2, and 3 in block 1 in Osborn’s addition to the town of Cullman, Ala., together with damages for the detention of it.

The defendant filed in the cause a written motion, which was afterwards amended, stating that it claimed an equitable right in a part of this land, and stated therein the substance of its equitable right and defense; and the motion as amended was verified by affidavit of a person who had knowledge of the facts alleged; and it prayed that the cause be transferred by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Cornelius v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Hendrix v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Ex parte CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Johnson v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Miller v. HolderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Holder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API