Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hunt, Hatch & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1920No. Civ. No. 2958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. J. A. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to recover an unpaid balance alleged to be due on the sale by plaintiff to the defendant of a crop of oranges. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

[1] In á written agreement, of date April 20, 1916, it was stated that the plaintiff “has this day sold” to the defendant his entire crop of oranges, now on the trees growing on his ranch at Lindsay, California, at a stated price per hundredweight. “All fruit is to be weighed at the Hunt, Hatch & Company’s packing house and paid for upon the delivery of duplicate weight receipts at their office at the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bill v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Brietengross v. Theodore Krumm, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Matmor Olive Co. v. Du BoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Stowe v. Fay Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API