Harrisburg Authority v. Cit Capital USA, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff The Harrisburg Authority’s (“THA”) appeal from the July 14, 2009 discovery order issued by Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser, (Doc. 78), which resolved THA’s Motion to Compel, (Doc. 59). For the reasons that follow, we shall deny the appeal and affirm the Magistrate Judge’s July 14, 2009 order.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1
The case sub judiee involves THA’s project to upgrade and modernize the Harrisburg Materials, Energy, Recycling and Recovery Facility, a trash-to-steam waste…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harrisburg Authority v. CIT Capital USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Mazer v. Frederick Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.