Legal Opinion
Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 1, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00292Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PACE-O-MATIC, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-00292 v. (WILSON, J.) (SAPORITO, M.J.) ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM This is a diversity action in which the plaintiff, Pace-O-Matic, Inc. (“POM”) has brought a state-law breach of fiduciary duty action against the defendant, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC (“Eckert”). POM, a Wyoming corporation with a principal place of business in Georgia, is a former client of Eckert, a law firm based in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. POM claims that Eckert…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.