Peoples State Bank v. Imperial Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff the owner and holder of five one-thousand dollar bonds of the defendant irrigation district, together with attached coupons, for declaratory relief and for an injunction restraining and prohibiting the defendant district from instituting proceedings under chapter X (now chap. IX) of the United States Bankruptcy Act. Chapter X (now chap. IX) of said act comprises sections 81 to 84 of said Bankruptcy Act. Said chapter was enacted as an amendment to the bankruptcy statute on August 16, 1937. (50 U. S. Stats., p. 653.)
Count one of the complaint purports…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BekinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Provident Land Corp. v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Wood v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Summer Lake Irr. Dist.District Court, D. Oregon · 1940
- Mason v. Banta Carbona Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Peoples State Bank v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940