Legal Opinion

Weikel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Jeffrey R. Weikel (Claimant) petitions for review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) finding that Claimant’s “flex dollars” did not constitute wages within the meaning of Section 309 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 Peco Energy (Employer) cross-appeals challenging the Board’s decision allowing Claimant’s appeal nunc pro tunc.

*1084On October 22, 1996, Claimant sustained an injury to his right wrist while in the course of his employment with Employer. Employer issued a Notice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Tony Grande, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Sellers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. C. Hannah & Sons Construction v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Sellers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API