Legal Opinion

Tony Grande, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1983No. Appeal, 131 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The petitioner, Tony Grande, Inc., appeals here from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which dismissed its appeal and granted the motion to quash filed by the claimant (Rodriguez). The claimant argues that the appeal was not filed within the time period prescribed in Section 423 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act) 1 , and it is undisputed that the appeal was not filed within the 20 day period provided for by the Act.

The petitioner contends that it was an abuse of discretion for the Board to refuse to exercise its power to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Wertman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Perry v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Walker v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Baum v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API