Legal Opinion
Hercules Inc. v. AIU Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided August 16, 2000No. 193, 2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The Court has before it the plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees, Hercules Incorporated (“Hercules”), motion to dismiss the cross-appeal from Sections II, II.C and III of the Superior Court’s September 30, 1998 opinion (the “cross-appeal”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Hercules contends that the cross-appeals must be dismissed since the Superior Court’s judgment was in the appellees’ favor. This Court has concluded that the motion to dismiss the cross-appeal must be denied. Accordingly, without considering the merits of the cross-appeal, we only decide that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gabriel Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles Daryl Gates, Martin Coon, ( 21604) in Both Their Personal and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Public Service Commission v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- State v. Black CloudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.