Legal Opinion
Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2006No. 2478 C.D. 2005, No. 2570 C.D. 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
The novel issue here is whether a Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Bureau) Hearing Officer may compensate a Utilization Review Organization (URO) for the Bureau’s improper revocation of authorization to conduct utilization reviews. Chiro-Med Review Company (Petitioner) petitions for review of the Hearing Officer’s order that sustained its appeal of a Bureau determination revoking its authorization to conduct utilization reviews. Petitioner contends the Hearing Officer erred by failing to compensate it for losses during the Bureau’s improper revocation of its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Powell v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Fawber v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Adair v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Womack v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- C. Byfield v. WCAB (Philadelphia Housing Authority)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Com. of PA v. G. EdwardsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- D.G. Szymanski v. Bd. of Supers. of New London Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.