Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”) moves to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint based on the unclean hands doctrine. The Court heard oral arguments on the motion on May 10, 2005. Because Plaintiff then had a pending petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court arising from an adverse Delaware judgment involving the parties, this Court deferred ruling on the motion until the Supreme Court determined its petition. The Supreme Court denied the petition and this Court now decides the motion. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Amended…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Halaw v. WildingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- NEWBORN BROS. CO., INC. v. ALBION ENGINEERING COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- PAGAN v. PEREZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC. v. DURGA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- VICCHAIRELLI v. NEW ENGLAND LINEN SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021