Legal Opinion
Burruss v. Early
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided March 23, 1942No. 61PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, District Judge.
This action having been tried upon the facts by the Court without a jury, the Court doth hereby find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon, and directs the entry of the appropriate judgment, as follows, in conformity with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c:
Findings of Fact.(1) The plaintiffs are R. S. Burruss and W. H. Burruss, partners, trading as Burruss Land and Lumber Company. The defendant is N. D. Early, Jr., Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Virginia. They are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Oil Co. v. FlyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Yellow Cab Co. of D. C., Inc. v. MagruderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
- Ayers v. HobbyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1954
- United States v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Los Angeles Athletic Club v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.