United States v. Bernstein
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In this tax refund case the question of law for decision is whether an officer of a corporation must necessarily (per se) be treated as an employee or only may be so treated according to the circumstances of the case, within the meaning of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1101, 49 Stat. 639, which imposes a tax on “Employers of Eight or More”. During the tax years here involved the corporate taxpayer had three officers and seven employees. The question was presented to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and is here on appeal in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Jones v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Texas Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Shriver v. Carlin & Fulton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Charlotte's Office Boutique, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
- Texas Carbonate Company v. R. L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- C.D. Ulrich, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Great American Insurance v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fort Dodge By-Products v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.