Legal Opinion

Rubeo v. Arthur McMullen Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 22, 1937PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Did the relationship of employer and employe exist at the time the latter journeyed from work to his home and during which journey he sustained injuries resulting in his death, or, in more terse language, did the accident resulting in the death of the employe arise out of and in the course of his employment?

This is a workmen’s compensation case. It is undisputable that the deceased employe was a good concrete mixer and had worked for the respondent, at varying intervals, for many years. In May of 1934 respondent had a contract at St. George,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Fisher v. Tidewater Building Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Manning & Brown, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rafferty v. Dairymen's League Co-operative Ass'n, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1938
  3. Dubit v. Sheffield Farms Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Huddock v. Grant Motor CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. Grotsky v. Charles Grotsky, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API