Legal Opinion

Bowyer v. Professional Underwriters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1934No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 37,766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff contracted with the principal defendants for the removal of an objectionable and unsightly growth of hair on her forearms and axillae and upon her chin. She sustained injuries incident to the treatment administered by the principal defendants. In her suit for damages she recovered judgment for $8,000. One of the principal defendants, Rudolph’s Tricho Institute, was insured against such liability as was involved to the extent of $5,000 in the Professional Underwriters, a Michigan reciprocal insurance exchange. In an effort to obtain satisfaction of her judgment, plaintiff garnisheed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Smith v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Towle v. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Douville v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Dickinson v. HomerichMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pastucha v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Oceano Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API