Legal Opinion
Jones v. Clinton
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 9, 1998No. LR-C-94-290PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
On the afternoon of January 28, 1998, the United States, by the Office of Independent Counsel (“OIC”), filed with this Court a motion for limited intervention and stay of discovery in the civil case of Jones v. Clinton, No. LR-C-94-290 (E.D.Ark.). In its motion, OIC argued that counsel for the plaintiff were deliberately shadowing the grand jury’s investigation of the matter involving Monica Lewinsky and that “the pending criminal investigation is of such gravity and paramount importance that this Court would do a disservice to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sherman White v. Crispus Nix Rob Glaser John Emmett James Burton Unknown/unnamed Sued as Two Unknown Bci AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Paul BEVAN, Cross-Appellant/Appellee, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Appellant/Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Frank v. County of HudsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Arden Way Associates v. BoeskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re City of Memphis, West Tennessee Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Zellner Construction Company, Inc. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Henningsen v. Worldcom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Jones v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999
- Henningsen v. WorldCom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Jones v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.