Legal Opinion
Arden Way Associates v. Boesky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 26, 1987No. 87 Civ. 1865 (MP), 87 Civ. 1898 (MP) and 87 Civ. 1892 (MP)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
The defendant, Ivan F. Boesky, has moved for entry of an order severing the claims against him in these civil suits and staying the severed claims. He asserts that severance is sought so that the claims against other defendants may proceed. He suggests as an alternative that the cases be stayed in their entirety.
The plaintiffs are limited partners in Ivan F. Boesky & Co., L.P. (the “partnership”) who allege in their complaints that they were defrauded in connection with their purchases of limited partnership interests. There are 42 plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Estado Libre Asociado v. Casta Developers, S.E.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2004
- LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.