Caballero v. Wikse
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
THE COURT’S PRIOR
OPINION DATED JULY 23, 2003 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN
SCHROEDER, Justice.
Respondents filed suit seeking specific performance of an alleged oral settlement agreement. The respondents alleged that the appellant’s attorney entered into a binding settlement agreement on behalf of the appellant. The appellant contended his attorney did not have authority to enter into the agreement and argued that the agreement was otherwise unenforceable. After a court-trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of the respondents. Appellant timely filed this appeal. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Bailey v. NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Bevercombe v. Denney & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Vreeken v. Lockwood Engineering, B.V.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Goodman v. LothropIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Primera Beef v. WardIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Montierth v. DorssersIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.