Kunst v. Vitale
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant Glenn E. Vitale1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiffs Barbara Kunst and Albert Kunst2 commenced this medical malpractice action following a surgical procedure to Barbara Kunst’s left foot performed by the defendant podiatrist. The jury awarded Barbara Kunst damages in the amount of $79,460, and Albert Kunst damages in the amount of $2500. The two issues we must consider on appeal are (1) whether the trial court properly submitted the case to the jury on a theory of simple negligence, and (2) whether…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Boyce v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Caron v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Gemme v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monterose v. CrossConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- O'Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Baldwin v. JableckiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Dallaire v. HsuConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Agnes v. Grem, No. Cv 99 0587276s (Jun. 26, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.