Legal Opinion

Kunst v. Vitale

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 13, 1996No. 14447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The defendant Glenn E. Vitale1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiffs Barbara Kunst and Albert Kunst2 commenced this medical malpractice action following a surgical procedure to Barbara Kunst’s left foot performed by the defendant podiatrist. The jury awarded Barbara Kunst damages in the amount of $79,460, and Albert Kunst damages in the amount of $2500. The two issues we must consider on appeal are (1) whether the trial court properly submitted the case to the jury on a theory of simple negligence, and (2) whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  2. State v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Boyce v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Caron v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Gemme v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monterose v. CrossConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. O'Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Baldwin v. JableckiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Dallaire v. HsuConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Agnes v. Grem, No. Cv 99 0587276s (Jun. 26, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API