Wilcox Trux, Inc. v. Rosenberger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on promissory notes by a holder not in due course, wherein the maker defends upon the grounds of fraud of the payee and a rescission because of such fraud. After verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding or for a new trial, and appeals from the order denying that motion.
The notes are two in number, one for $1,000 and one for $1,500, and represent the subscription price of stock in a corporation which has since become insolvent; has gone through a receivership and a reorganization, resulting in the taking over of its assets and business by plaintiff, which by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Fear v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Bartlett v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Burningham v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Pearson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.