Legal Opinion

Wilcox Trux, Inc. v. Rosenberger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1923No. 23,574PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action on promissory notes by a holder not in due course, wherein the maker defends upon the grounds of fraud of the payee and a rescission because of such fraud. After verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding or for a new trial, and appeals from the order denying that motion.

The notes are two in number, one for $1,000 and one for $1,500, and represent the subscription price of stock in a corporation which has since become insolvent; has gone through a receivership and a reorganization, resulting in the taking over of its assets and business by plaintiff, which by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Fear v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  5. Bartlett v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. State v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Burningham v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Pearson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API