Legal Opinion

Rosnick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1955No. 193-54PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

On April 5, 1955, the court rendered an opinion granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff has now moved for a rehearing, contending, inter alia, that the court erred as a matter of law in failing to view the petition in the light most favorable to plaintiff. He now asks that at the very least the dismissal should be without prejudice with leave to amend his petition to restate his cause of action.

Although plaintiff’s petition was filed prior to this court’s decision in Uhley v. United States, 121 F.Supp. 674, 128 Ct. Cl. 608, and never amended,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oro Fina Consolidated Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Uhley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Eicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  3. Levadi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Levine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API