May v. George A. Rheman Co.

LOVETT, District Judge.

There are several motions presented and argued at length in this case. The first for consideration is the motion to remand, because, if remanded, the other motions should be determined by the state court.

In Gallahar et al. v. Rheman Co., decided July 2, 1943, companion cases of this, all growing out of the same automobile accident, I concluded there was a separable controversy between plaintiffs and certain non-resident defendants and that no claim for relief had been stated against the resident defendants. 655 F.Supp. 50. Here I reach the opposite conclusion. The…